Why Malaysia’s proposed LVG Tax misses the mark

A new tax will be implemented on the 1st of January, 2024 called the Low Value Tax  (LVG) which imposing a 10% tax on all imported goods valued below RM500. However,  the Madani Government is under pressure to find ways to close the Fiscal Gap that  has been widening in recent decade, Institute of Strategic Analysis and Policy Research (INSAP) is of the opinion that the LVG is flawed  as a taxation system and extremely regressive.

In an attempt to close the fiscal gap, the Najib administration introduced the Goods  and Services Tax (GST) in 2015 which was meant to bring about a broad-based  taxation system to replace the old Sales and Services Tax (SST). However, this policy  was abolished in 2018 under the second Mahathir administration (also known as  Pakatan Harapan 1.0). PH1.0 was then under tremendous pressure to deliver a major  campaign promise, which was to abolish the GST.

Upon further research, INSAP has found that the LVG is only projected to achieve a  collection of a mere RM200 million, according to the information tabled by the Ministry  of Finance at the 14th Parliament (2018-2022) on 4th August 2022. 

At that time, the proposed new tax was already met with heavy criticisms by the  Pakatan Harapan coalition who were on the Opposition bench. In under 2 years in  power, the very same party that objected to the tax is now pushing this through by  January 2024, and without proper consultation with the Malaysian public. As far as we  are aware, there has not been any comprehensive stakeholder engagement nor,  public awareness campaign carried out to inform the Malaysian public at large of the  LVG.

INSAP believes that this new tax called the Low Value Goods tax is punitive to the  lower income groups as it applies only to imported to goods below RM500. This is  presumably also an attempt to plug the tax leakage that is prevalent in the Online  Market Place (OMP). On top of it, the process of collection is unclear hence, the roll out plan and collection are not transparent thus, may be subjected to abuse.

According to Table 1, LVG is expected to fall far short of the government’s objective in  boosting its sources of revenue. At RM200m, it represents only 0.007% of what the  GST could in 2017 (RM44 billion).

Note: Malaysia implemented GST in April 2015, and it was abolished in 2019 to be replaced with SST1 2023 INSAP Compilation.

The amount of 0.007% is negligible compared to the GST as a fairer and by far more effective tax  system. The huge difference exposes the LVG’s ineffectiveness as a revenue generating measure and highlights the government’s missed opportunity for a  comprehensive and sustainable fiscal solution, that is the GST.

Instead of focusing on the LVG, the Madani government should admit that they have  made a disastrous mistake in abolishing the GST in 2018. The multi-tiered GST  structure boasts numerous advantages over the LVG. 

This regressive design of the LVG contradicts the very principles of a just and equitable  tax system, placing an undue burden on those who can least afford and  disproportionately cripples low-income B40 households. These everyday essentials,  vital for their daily lives and micro-businesses, bear the brunt of this targeted tax,  exacerbating existing inequalities and making the low-income earner pay more while  generating insignificant returns for the national income. 

In conclusion, the LVG tax is a deeply flawed gambit that fails on multiple fronts. It  undermines national revenue goals, unfairly burdens vulnerable B40 communities, and offers a paltry economic return while jeopardizing social justice and sustainable  development.

Previous articleGDB Secures RM306 Million Contract To Build Private In Bukit Jalil
Next articleSingapore Regulator Begins In-depth Review On Grab’s Acquisition Of Trans-cab

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here